Close
Close
Browser Compatibility Notification
It appears you are trying to access this site using an outdated browser. As a result, parts of the site may not function properly for you. We recommend updating your browser to its most recent version at your earliest convenience.
Skip to Content
Home
I'd Like To...
Greo Logo
Contact Us Main menu icon
  • About Us
    • What We Do
    • Team
    • Our Philosophy
    • Board of Directors
    • Join Us
    View our Evidence Centre page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Services
    • Funding Opportunities
    • Applied Research
    • Knowledge Products 
    • Knowledge Management
    • Stakeholder Engagement
    • Impact Evaluation
    • Project Consulting
    View our Evidence Centre search page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Resources
    • Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling
    • Data Repository
    • Evidence Centre
    • Gambling from a Public Health Perspective
    • Prevention and Education Review: Gambling-Related Harm
    • Research to Inform Action Evidence Hub
    • Safer Gambling Evaluation Evidence Hub
    • Resources for Safer Gambling During COVID-19
    View our Evidence Centre search page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Partners
    • Network to Reduce Gambling Harms
    • Academic Forum for the Study of Gambling (AFSG)
    • National Strategy to Reduce Gambling Harms in Great Britain
    View our Evidence Centre page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Contact
    • Get in Touch
    • Helplines
    View our Evidence Centre page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Search
News:
Pause

A two-step method for measuring gambling-related harms

Show or hide navigation More
Decrease text size Default text size Increase text size
Print This Page
Share This Page
  • Open new window to share this page via Facebook Facebook
  • Open new window to share this page via LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Open new window to share this page via Twitter Twitter
  • Email This page Email
View Abstract View Snapshot Back to Search Results

snapshot summaries


Author(s): Shannon, Kirsten ; Anjoul, Fadi ; Blaszczynski, Alex

Journal: International Gambling Studies

Year Published: 2017

Date Added: December 06, 2017

Problem gambling is when a person cannot control how much they gamble even though they experience harmful effects from gambling. Gambling-related harms can include mental health issues, money problems, relationship troubles, poor job performance, and trouble with the law. 

Health professionals and researchers often use problem gambling screens to measure gambling-related harms. Popular questionnaires, such as the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI), have been developed to assess gambling behaviours and consequences. Based on their scores, gamblers are identified as a problem gambler, a low or moderate risk gambler, or a non-problem gambler. Although the questionnaires are useful for identifying people with serious gambling problems, there is no way to accurately assess the different types of harm someone experiences from gambling. Moreover, this approach implies that only those who score above a threshold are negatively affected by gambling and need treatment. It does not consider that non-problem gamblers can also experience harms. 

To fill this gap in research, the researchers developed a questionnaire with a two-step method to measure gambling-related harms. They applied that method to map the harms experienced by problem and community gamblers and to identify which harms impact them the most. 


Citation: Shannon, K., Anjoul, F., & Blaszczynski, A. (2017). Mapping the proportional distribution of gambling-related harms in a clinical and community sample. International Gambling Studies, 17(3), 366-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2017.1333131

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2017.1333131

Keywords: assessment ; gambling ; harms ; measurement ; problem gambling ; problem gambling severity

Topics: Gambling Assessment ; Gambling Related Harms

Response Rate: 100% for the clinical sample; 57% for the community sample

Study Design: Descriptive: Survey

Geographic Coverage: Australia

Study Population: Problem gamblers attending a specialist university-based problem gambling service, and regular gamblers living in the community

Sampling Procedure: The clinical sample completed the study questionnaire as part of the clinic’s standard assessment battery. The community sample was recruited using random-digit dialing.

Related Resources:
  • Harms measurement: How do we measure population harm?
Login to Edit

Receive Email Updates...
×
Greo promotes health and well-being by mobilizing evidence to prevent and mitigate harms related to gambling, gaming, technology use, and the use of substances.
 
© 2026 Greo Evidence Insights
Suite 195, 3-304 Stone Road West
Guelph, ON N1G 4W4
Canada

Tel: (519) 763-8049

Twitter icon 

AccessibilityPrivacySitemapEvidence CentreContact UsBoard Login
Designed by eSolutions Group
  • About Us
    • What We Do
    • Team
    • Our Philosophy
    • Board of Directors
    • Join Us
  • Services
    • Funding Opportunities
    • Applied Research
    • Knowledge Products 
    • Knowledge Management
    • Stakeholder Engagement
    • Impact Evaluation
    • Project Consulting
  • Resources
    • Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling
    • Data Repository
    • Evidence Centre
    • Gambling from a Public Health Perspective
    • Prevention and Education Review: Gambling-Related Harm
    • Research to Inform Action Evidence Hub
    • Safer Gambling Evaluation Evidence Hub
    • Resources for Safer Gambling During COVID-19
  • Partners
    • Network to Reduce Gambling Harms
    • Academic Forum for the Study of Gambling (AFSG)
    • National Strategy to Reduce Gambling Harms in Great Britain
  • Contact
    • Get in Touch
    • Helplines