Close
Close
Browser Compatibility Notification
It appears you are trying to access this site using an outdated browser. As a result, parts of the site may not function properly for you. We recommend updating your browser to its most recent version at your earliest convenience.
Skip to Content
Home
I'd Like To...
Greo Logo
Contact Us Main menu icon
  • About Us
    • What We Do
    • Team
    • Our Philosophy
    • Board of Directors
    • Join Us
    View our Evidence Centre page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Services
    • Funding Opportunities
    • Applied Research
    • Knowledge Products 
    • Knowledge Management
    • Stakeholder Engagement
    • Impact Evaluation
    • Project Consulting
    View our Evidence Centre search page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Resources
    • Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling
    • Data Repository
    • Evidence Centre
    • Gambling from a Public Health Perspective
    • Prevention and Education Review: Gambling-Related Harm
    • Research to Inform Action Evidence Hub
    • Safer Gambling Evaluation Evidence Hub
    • Resources for Safer Gambling During COVID-19
    View our Evidence Centre search page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Partners
    • Network to Reduce Gambling Harms
    • Academic Forum for the Study of Gambling (AFSG)
    • National Strategy to Reduce Gambling Harms in Great Britain
    View our Evidence Centre page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Contact
    • Get in Touch
    • Helplines
    View our Evidence Centre page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Search
News:
Pause

Understanding non-response to the British gambling prevalence survey 2007

Show or hide navigation More
Decrease text size Default text size Increase text size
Print This Page
Share This Page
  • Open new window to share this page via Facebook Facebook
  • Open new window to share this page via LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Open new window to share this page via Twitter Twitter
  • Email This page Email
View Resource Back to Search Results

Reports


Author(s): Scholes, Shaun ; Wardle, Heather ; Sproston, Kerry ; Erens, Bob ; Griffiths, Mark D. ; Orford, Jim

Publisher: Gambling Commission

Year Published: 2008

Date Added: April 09, 2015

Resource Type: Research report

Participation in surveys such as the British Gambling Prevalence Survey (BGPS) 2007 is a sequence of many steps – from the selection of a sample of addresses to the transferral of full interview data from respondents to the survey organisation. Each step of the process represents an opportunity for non-response to occur - potentially introducing bias into key survey estimates as the behaviour and views of those who do not respond may be different from those who do participate. The aim of this report was to examine potential non-response biases to the BGPS 2007 in three main areas. These were: 1) Household non-response - where the selected household does not participate for whatever reason. 2) Individual non-response - where an eligible respondent aged 16 and over, within a co-operating household, does not participate. 3) Item non-response – where a respondent chooses not to answer certain survey questions. In addition, this report examined the adjustments that were made to the BGPS 2007 data to account for non-response and looked at where improvements could be made for future studies within the BGPS series.


Keywords: prevalence ; survey

Geographic Coverage: United Kingdom

Source: Gambling Commission

Related Resources:
  • British gambling prevalance survey 2007
Login to Edit

Receive Email Updates...
×
Greo promotes health and well-being by mobilizing evidence to prevent and mitigate harms related to gambling, gaming, technology use, and the use of substances.
 
© 2026 Greo Evidence Insights
Suite 195, 3-304 Stone Road West
Guelph, ON N1G 4W4
Canada

Tel: (519) 763-8049

Twitter icon 

AccessibilityPrivacySitemapEvidence CentreContact UsBoard Login
Designed by eSolutions Group
  • About Us
    • What We Do
    • Team
    • Our Philosophy
    • Board of Directors
    • Join Us
  • Services
    • Funding Opportunities
    • Applied Research
    • Knowledge Products 
    • Knowledge Management
    • Stakeholder Engagement
    • Impact Evaluation
    • Project Consulting
  • Resources
    • Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling
    • Data Repository
    • Evidence Centre
    • Gambling from a Public Health Perspective
    • Prevention and Education Review: Gambling-Related Harm
    • Research to Inform Action Evidence Hub
    • Safer Gambling Evaluation Evidence Hub
    • Resources for Safer Gambling During COVID-19
  • Partners
    • Network to Reduce Gambling Harms
    • Academic Forum for the Study of Gambling (AFSG)
    • National Strategy to Reduce Gambling Harms in Great Britain
  • Contact
    • Get in Touch
    • Helplines