Close
Close
Browser Compatibility Notification
It appears you are trying to access this site using an outdated browser. As a result, parts of the site may not function properly for you. We recommend updating your browser to its most recent version at your earliest convenience.
Skip to Content
Home
I'd Like To...
Greo Logo
Contact Us Main menu icon
  • About Us
    • What We Do
    • Team
    • Our Philosophy
    • Board of Directors
    • Join Us
    View our Evidence Centre page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Services
    • Funding Opportunities
    • Applied Research
    • Knowledge Products 
    • Knowledge Management
    • Stakeholder Engagement
    • Impact Evaluation
    • Project Consulting
    View our Evidence Centre search page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Resources
    • Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling
    • Data Repository
    • Evidence Centre
    • Gambling from a Public Health Perspective
    • Prevention and Education Review: Gambling-Related Harm
    • Research to Inform Action Evidence Hub
    • Safer Gambling Evaluation Evidence Hub
    • Resources for Safer Gambling During COVID-19
    View our Evidence Centre search page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Partners
    • Network to Reduce Gambling Harms
    • Academic Forum for the Study of Gambling (AFSG)
    • National Strategy to Reduce Gambling Harms in Great Britain
    View our Evidence Centre page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Contact
    • Get in Touch
    • Helplines
    View our Evidence Centre page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Search
News:
Pause

Does psychological reactance affect how people respond to government restrictions on sport gambling and daily fantasy sport?

Show or hide navigation More
Decrease text size Default text size Increase text size
Print This Page
Share This Page
  • Open new window to share this page via Facebook Facebook
  • Open new window to share this page via LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Open new window to share this page via Twitter Twitter
  • Email This page Email
View Abstract View Snapshot Back to Search Results

snapshot summaries


Author(s): Shapiro, Stephen L. ; Drayer, Joris ; Dwyer, Brendan

Journal: Sport Management Review

Year Published: 2020

Date Added: August 29, 2020

Gambling on professional sports and fantasy sports are both popular in the US. Recently, some types of sport gambling have been legalized in some states, while they are restricted in others. People with ‘high reactance’ tendencies have a stronger desire to perform an activity if it is restricted. The researchers showed some participants a scenario where sport gambling or daily fantasy sport would become legal in their state, and told others it would be illegal or discouraged. They then asked participants to rate their desire to gamble in the future. Participants generally had stronger desires to gamble if they were told it would be legal to do so. However, for daily fantasy sport, participants with high reactance had stronger desires to gamble when they were told it would be illegal or discouraged.


Citation: Shapiro, S. L., Drayer, J., & Dwyer, B. (2020). An examination of consumer reactance to daily fantasy sport and sport gambling regulatory restrictions. Sport Management Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2020.02.006

Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2020.02.006

Keywords: fantasy sports ; psychological factors ; sports betting

Topics: Fantasy Sports ; Sports Betting

Conceptual Framework Factors:   Psychological - Personality and Temperament ; Gambling Types ; Psychological Factors

Response Rate: Survey 1: N=748, Survey 2: N=300, (Total N=1048)

Study Design: Experimental: RCT (randomized controlled trial)

Geographic Coverage: United States of America

Study Population: Adults from the US who gamble with fantasy sports (N=748) and/or bet money on the National Football League (NFL) (N=300). 65% of participants were male

Sampling Procedure: The researchers recruited participants using Qualtrics survey panel for study 1 with fantasy sports consumers and Amazon Mechanical Turk for study 2 with NFL consumers. They screened potential participants to ensure they met the inclusion criteria (for survey 1, they had to have participated in fantasy sport in the past 12 months, and for survey 2 they had to have bet on the NFL in the past 12 months)

Study Funding:

No funding was declared.

Login to Edit

Receive Email Updates...
×
Greo promotes health and well-being by mobilizing evidence to prevent and mitigate harms related to gambling, gaming, technology use, and the use of substances.
 
© 2026 Greo Evidence Insights
Suite 195, 3-304 Stone Road West
Guelph, ON N1G 4W4
Canada

Tel: (519) 763-8049

Twitter icon 

AccessibilityPrivacySitemapEvidence CentreContact UsBoard Login
Designed by eSolutions Group
  • About Us
    • What We Do
    • Team
    • Our Philosophy
    • Board of Directors
    • Join Us
  • Services
    • Funding Opportunities
    • Applied Research
    • Knowledge Products 
    • Knowledge Management
    • Stakeholder Engagement
    • Impact Evaluation
    • Project Consulting
  • Resources
    • Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling
    • Data Repository
    • Evidence Centre
    • Gambling from a Public Health Perspective
    • Prevention and Education Review: Gambling-Related Harm
    • Research to Inform Action Evidence Hub
    • Safer Gambling Evaluation Evidence Hub
    • Resources for Safer Gambling During COVID-19
  • Partners
    • Network to Reduce Gambling Harms
    • Academic Forum for the Study of Gambling (AFSG)
    • National Strategy to Reduce Gambling Harms in Great Britain
  • Contact
    • Get in Touch
    • Helplines