Close
Close
Browser Compatibility Notification
It appears you are trying to access this site using an outdated browser. As a result, parts of the site may not function properly for you. We recommend updating your browser to its most recent version at your earliest convenience.
Skip to Content
Home
I'd Like To...
Greo Logo
Contact Us Main menu icon
  • About Us
    • What We Do
    • Team
    • Our Philosophy
    • Board of Directors
    • Join Us
    View our Evidence Centre page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Services
    • Funding Opportunities
    • Applied Research
    • Knowledge Products 
    • Knowledge Management
    • Stakeholder Engagement
    • Impact Evaluation
    • Project Consulting
    View our Evidence Centre search page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Resources
    • Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling
    • Data Repository
    • Evidence Centre
    • Gambling from a Public Health Perspective
    • Prevention and Education Review: Gambling-Related Harm
    • Research to Inform Action Evidence Hub
    • Safer Gambling Evaluation Evidence Hub
    • Resources for Safer Gambling During COVID-19
    View our Evidence Centre search page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Partners
    • Network to Reduce Gambling Harms
    • Academic Forum for the Study of Gambling (AFSG)
    • National Strategy to Reduce Gambling Harms in Great Britain
    View our Evidence Centre page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Contact
    • Get in Touch
    • Helplines
    View our Evidence Centre page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Search
News:
Pause

The influence of financial risk-taking and religiosity on financial decision-making tasks

Show or hide navigation More
Decrease text size Default text size Increase text size
Print This Page
Share This Page
  • Open new window to share this page via Facebook Facebook
  • Open new window to share this page via LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Open new window to share this page via Twitter Twitter
  • Email This page Email
View Open Access Article View Snapshot Back to Search Results

snapshot summaries


Author(s): Vanheusden, Frederique J. ; Vadapalli, Sundara Kashyap ; Rashid, Mamunur ; Griffiths, Mark D. ; Kim, Amee

Journal: Journal of Gambling Studies

Year Published: 2024

Date Added: September 20, 2024

The current study examined the extent to which financial risk-taking (FRT) and religiosity influence how people perform on financial decision-making tasks when they experience risk and/or uncertainty. A total of 37 adults participated in the study. Participants completed questionnaires that asked about their attitude towards FRT and religiosity. They also completed four decision-making tasks, including the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART), the Iowa Gambling Test (IGT), the Mixed-Gamble Loss-Aversion Task (MGLAT), and the MGLA Success Task (MGLAST). Electro-encephalogram (EEG) data were collected as participants completed these tasks.

FRT and religiosity did not significantly influence IGT and MGLA/MGLAST performance. The findings from the BART showed that performance was influenced by FRT and religiosity. In particular, very religious, risk-neutral participants tended to engage in more extreme behaviours during the task in situations with high uncertainty. Physiological reaction towards feedback could also be distinguished between religious and non-religious participants using EEG data.


Citation: Vanheusden, F. J., Vadapalli, S. K., Rashid, M., Griffiths, M. D., & Kim, A. (2024). Religiosity, financial risk taking, and reward processing: An experimental study. Journal of Gambling Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-024-10324-4

Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-024-10324-4

Keywords: decision making ; financial harms ; religion

Topics: Gambling and the Brain ; Religion

Conceptual Framework Factors:   Psychological Factors ; Cultural Factors ; Cultural - Religion and Other Belief Systems ; Psychological - Judgement and Decision Making

Study Design: Experimental: NRCT (non-randomized controlled trial)

Geographic Coverage: United Kingdom

Study Population: A total of 37 participants were recruited from the general population, including 14 males and 23 females.

Sampling Procedure: A total of 37 participants were recruited from the general population through posters displayed on a university campus in the UK and through social media (Reddit, LinkedIn).

Study Funding:

This study received no direct funding.

Login to Edit

Receive Email Updates...
×
Greo promotes health and well-being by mobilizing evidence to prevent and mitigate harms related to gambling, gaming, technology use, and the use of substances.
 
© 2025 Greo Evidence Insights
Suite 195, 3-304 Stone Road West
Guelph, ON N1G 4W4
Canada

Tel: (519) 763-8049

Twitter icon 

AccessibilityPrivacySitemapEvidence CentreContact UsBoard Login
Designed by eSolutions Group
  • About Us
    • What We Do
    • Team
    • Our Philosophy
    • Board of Directors
    • Join Us
  • Services
    • Funding Opportunities
    • Applied Research
    • Knowledge Products 
    • Knowledge Management
    • Stakeholder Engagement
    • Impact Evaluation
    • Project Consulting
  • Resources
    • Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling
    • Data Repository
    • Evidence Centre
    • Gambling from a Public Health Perspective
    • Prevention and Education Review: Gambling-Related Harm
    • Research to Inform Action Evidence Hub
    • Safer Gambling Evaluation Evidence Hub
    • Resources for Safer Gambling During COVID-19
  • Partners
    • Network to Reduce Gambling Harms
    • Academic Forum for the Study of Gambling (AFSG)
    • National Strategy to Reduce Gambling Harms in Great Britain
  • Contact
    • Get in Touch
    • Helplines