Close
Close
Browser Compatibility Notification
It appears you are trying to access this site using an outdated browser. As a result, parts of the site may not function properly for you. We recommend updating your browser to its most recent version at your earliest convenience.
Skip to Content
Home
I'd Like To...
Greo Logo
Contact Us Main menu icon
  • About Us
    • What We Do
    • Team
    • Board of Directors
    • Join Us
    View our Evidence Centre page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Services
    • Funding Opportunities
    • Applied Research
    • Knowledge Products 
    • Knowledge Management
    • Stakeholder Engagement
    • Impact Evaluation
    • Project Consulting
    View our Evidence Centre search page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Resources
    • Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling
    • Data Repository
    • Evidence Centre
    • Gambling from a Public Health Perspective
    • Prevention and Education Review: Gambling-Related Harm
    • Research to Inform Action Evidence Hub
    • Safer Gambling Evaluation Evidence Hub
    • Resources for Safer Gambling During COVID-19
    View our Evidence Centre search page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Partners
    • National Strategy to Reduce Gambling Harms in Great Britain
    • Academic Forum for the Study of Gambling (AFSG)
    View our Evidence Centre page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Contact
    • Get in Touch
    • Helplines
    View our Evidence Centre page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Search
News:
Pause

Voluntary self-exclusion is not a reliable way to measure problem gambling

Show or hide navigation More
Decrease text size Default text size Increase text size
Print This Page
Share This Page
  • Open new window to share this page via Facebook Facebook
  • Open new window to share this page via LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Open new window to share this page via Twitter Twitter
  • Email This page Email
View Open Access Article View Snapshot Back to Search Results

snapshot summaries


Author(s): Catania, Maris ; Griffiths, Mark D.

Journal: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Year Published: 2021

Date Added: July 10, 2021

Voluntary self-exclusion (VSE) allows people to remove their access to an online gambling account for a certain period of time. Past research studies have used VSE as an indirect way to measure problem gambling. However, some studies found that not all people who use VSE have a gambling problem. This study investigated if VSE is a good proxy measure for problem gambling. Data were provided by Unibet, an online gambling company with customers in the UK. The researchers compared between 7732 customers who chose VSE for six months and 141 customers who closed their account because of a gambling addiction.

The results showed that half of the customers who used VSE did so within the first seven days of opening their account. Customers who used VSE spent less money than customers who closed an account because of a gambling addiction. There were large differences in the number of days gambling and amount of money spent prior to VSE. The researchers concluded that VSE is not a reliable way to determine if a customer has problem gambling.


Citation: Catania, M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2021). Understanding online voluntary self-exclusion in gambling: An empirical study using account-based behavioral tracking data. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 2000. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042000

Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042000

Keywords: behavioural tracking ; consumer protection ; gambling operators ; responsible gambling ; self-exclusion

Topics: Gambling Resources ; Information for Operators

Conceptual Framework Factors:   Environment - Culture of Social Responsibility ; Environment - Responsible Gambling ; Resources - Harm Reduction, Prevention, and Protection ; Gambling Environment ; Gambling Resources

Study Design: Observational: Cross-sectional

Geographic Coverage: United Kingdom

Study Population: UK customers who chose to use the 6-month voluntary self-exclusion (n = 7732) or closed their account for self-reported gambling addiction with Unibet (n = 114). Ntotal = 7846

Sampling Procedure: The researchers were given access to a large anonymized dataset of customers at Unibet. The data covered the period from January 2017 to May 2018.

Study Funding:

This research received no external funding.

Login to Edit

Receive Email Updates...
×

© 2023 Greo

Suite 195, 3-304 Stone Road West
Guelph, ON, N1G 4W4
Tel: (519) 763-8049

Twitter icon

AccessibilityPrivacySitemapEvidence CentreContact UsBoard Login
Designed by eSolutions Group
  • About Us
    • What We Do
    • Team
    • Board of Directors
    • Join Us
  • Services
    • Funding Opportunities
    • Applied Research
    • Knowledge Products 
    • Knowledge Management
    • Stakeholder Engagement
    • Impact Evaluation
    • Project Consulting
  • Resources
    • Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling
    • Data Repository
    • Evidence Centre
    • Gambling from a Public Health Perspective
    • Prevention and Education Review: Gambling-Related Harm
    • Research to Inform Action Evidence Hub
    • Safer Gambling Evaluation Evidence Hub
    • Resources for Safer Gambling During COVID-19
  • Partners
    • National Strategy to Reduce Gambling Harms in Great Britain
    • Academic Forum for the Study of Gambling (AFSG)
  • Contact
    • Get in Touch
    • Helplines