Close
Close
Browser Compatibility Notification
It appears you are trying to access this site using an outdated browser. As a result, parts of the site may not function properly for you. We recommend updating your browser to its most recent version at your earliest convenience.
Home
I'd Like To...
Greo Logo
Contact Us Main menu icon
  • About Us
    • What We Do
    • Team
    • Board of Directors
    • Join Us
    View our Evidence Centre page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Services
    • Funding Opportunities
    • Applied Research
    • Knowledge Products 
    • Knowledge Management
    • Stakeholder Engagement
    • Impact Evaluation
    • Project Consulting
    View our Evidence Centre search page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Resources
    • Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling
    • Data Repository
    • Evidence Centre
    • Gambling from a Public Health Perspective
    • Prevention and Education Review: Gambling-Related Harm
    • Research to Inform Action Evidence Hub
    • Safer Gambling Evaluation Evidence Hub
    • Resources for Safer Gambling During COVID-19
    View our Evidence Centre search page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Partners
    • National Strategy to Reduce Gambling Harms in Great Britain
    • Academic Forum for the Study of Gambling (AFSG)
    View our Evidence Centre page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Contact
    • Get in Touch
    • Helplines
    View our Evidence Centre page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Search
News:
Pause
  • Safer Gambling Evaluation Evidence Hub
    • About
    • Evaluation Tools and Resources
    • Get Involved
    • Evaluation Primer
    • Types of Evaluation
    • Evaluations during the COVID-19 Pandemic
    • Safer Gambling Evaluations
    • Safer Gambling Theories of Change
    • Evaluation Ethics
  • Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling
  • Data Repository
  • Evidence Centre
  • Gambling from a Public Health Perspective
  • Prevention and Education Review: Gambling-Related Harm
  • Research to Inform Action Evidence Hub
  • Resources for Safer Gambling During COVID-19

Evaluation Primer

Show or hide navigation More

More in this Section...

Decrease text size Default text size Increase text size
Print This Page
Share This Page
  • Open new window to share this page via Facebook Facebook
  • Open new window to share this page via LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Open new window to share this page via Twitter Twitter
  • Email This page Email
Home/Resources/Safer Gambling Evaluation Evidence Hub/Evaluation Primer

Related Links

Contact Us

colored pencils

Evaluation overview

Evaluation is a systematic yet flexible approach to learning about and improving the value of programmes, policies, and interventions. Evaluation is critical to improving the quality and delivery of safer gambling programmes.

Good evaluation is more than just an activity to complete periodically; it is a way of embedding a culture of curiosity and learning to improve the impact of our safer gambling activities. Stakeholders drive the purpose and intended use of the evaluation, and an evaluation design is selected to meet those needs. A “good” evaluation design is one that will generate credible, defensible, and usable findings to inform future programming or policy decisions, and can vary significantly from one setting to another.

Benefits of evaluation

Evaluation activities aim to:1

  1. Measure change created by a programme, including unintended consequences.
  2. Make sense of the context that surrounds a programme, and how these circumstances influence the programme's outcomes for different stakeholders.
  3. Contribute to the evidence-base about what works and how resources should be allocated to maximise benefits.
  4. Create a culture of critical thinking that builds in systematic ways of understanding problems and testing solutions.

Conducting evaluations of programmes, policies, and services on a regular basis is critical to strengthening interventions, improving resource allocation, and demonstrating accountability.2,3

Evaluation steps

There are five main steps to complete an evaluation:   

  1. Set the stage: Engage stakeholders to clarify the purpose and intended use of the evaluation.
  2. Measure what matters: Design an evaluation that is proportionate, feasible, and will provide stakeholders with meaningful insight to inform decision making.
  3. Implement to understand: Leverage resources and expertise to conduct the evaluation, with contingency planning for bumps experienced along the way.
  4. Analyse to learn: Use collected data to help answer the original evaluation questions and, make connections for implications related to programme design and delivery.
  5. Sustain and manage change: Create programme and organisation level changes to improve outcomes for intended beneficiaries based on evaluation findings, while acknowledging that change can be difficult.

When not to evaluate

As important as evaluation is, there are several instances in which evaluation should not be done. For example, an evaluation should not be completed when the findings of an evaluability assessment indicates the intervention is not ready to be evaluated or there is not genuine commitment from stakeholders to use the findings (positive or negative) to inform decision making.4,5

Additional resources

For more information on evaluation, visit the resource below or contact evaluation@greo.ca to see how Greo can help.

  • Evaluation Protocol (GambleAware)


1 UK Evaluation Society. What is evaluation? https://www.evaluation.org.uk/about-us/what-is-evaluation/

2 Public Health England (2018). Guidance: Introduction to evaluation. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/evaluation-in-health-and-well-being-overview/introduction-to-evaluation#:~:text=Evaluation%20involves%20collection%20of%20information,about%20future%20courses%20of%20action

3 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Program Performance and Evaluation Office (PPEO). Introduction to Program Evaluation for Public Health Programs: A self-study guide. https://www.cdc.gov/eval/guide/introduction/index.htm

4 Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

5 Weiss, C. (1972). Evaluation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Receive Email Updates...
×

© 2023 Greo

Suite 195, 3-304 Stone Road West
Guelph, ON, N1G 4W4
Tel: (519) 763-8049

Twitter icon

AccessibilityPrivacySitemapEvidence CentreContact UsBoard Login
Designed by eSolutions Group
  • About Us
    • What We Do
    • Team
    • Board of Directors
    • Join Us
  • Services
    • Funding Opportunities
    • Applied Research
    • Knowledge Products 
    • Knowledge Management
    • Stakeholder Engagement
    • Impact Evaluation
    • Project Consulting
  • Resources
    • Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling
    • Data Repository
    • Evidence Centre
    • Gambling from a Public Health Perspective
    • Prevention and Education Review: Gambling-Related Harm
    • Research to Inform Action Evidence Hub
    • Safer Gambling Evaluation Evidence Hub
    • Resources for Safer Gambling During COVID-19
  • Partners
    • National Strategy to Reduce Gambling Harms in Great Britain
    • Academic Forum for the Study of Gambling (AFSG)
  • Contact
    • Get in Touch
    • Helplines