Close
Close
Browser Compatibility Notification
It appears you are trying to access this site using an outdated browser. As a result, parts of the site may not function properly for you. We recommend updating your browser to its most recent version at your earliest convenience.
Home
I'd Like To...

GREO logo

Contact Us Main menu icon
  • About Us
    • What We Do
    • Team
    • Board of Directors
    • Join Us
    View our Evidence Centre page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Services
    • Applied Research
    • Knowledge Products 
    • Knowledge Management
    • Stakeholder Engagement
    • Impact Evaluation
    • Project Consulting
    View our Evidence Centre search page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Resources
    • Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling
    • Data Repository
    • Evidence Centre
    • Gambling from a Public Health Perspective
    • Research to Inform Action Evidence Hub
    • Safer Gambling Evaluation Evidence Hub
    • Resources for Safer Gambling During COVID-19
    View our Evidence Centre search page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Partners
    • Gambling Commission
    • Funding Opportunities
    View our Evidence Centre page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Contact
    • Get in Touch
    • Helplines
    View our Evidence Centre page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Search
News:
Pause
  • Safer Gambling Evaluation Evidence Hub
    • About
    • Evaluation Primer
    • Types of Evaluation
    • Evaluations during the COVID-19 Pandemic
    • Safer Gambling Evaluations
    • Safer Gambling Theories of Change
    • Evaluation Tools and Resources
  • Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling
  • Data Repository
  • Evidence Centre
  • Gambling from a Public Health Perspective
  • Research to Inform Action Evidence Hub
  • Resources for Safer Gambling During COVID-19

Safer Gambling Theories of Change

Show or hide navigation More

More in this Section...

Decrease text size Default text size Increase text size
Print This Page
Share This Page
  • Open new window to share this page via Facebook Facebook
  • Open new window to share this page via LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Open new window to share this page via Twitter Twitter
  • Email This page Email
Home/Resources/Safer Gambling Evaluation Evidence Hub/Safer Gambling Theories of Change

Related Links

Contact Us

Five arrows pointing one way. One arrow pointing the other way.

Theory of change overview

Good evaluation requires a thorough understanding of how and why a programme, activity, or initiative works in practice to achieve its intended outcomes. A theory of change, often described as a “programme theory”, captures all those details in one diagram.

Benefits of a theory of change

A theory of change helps to:

  • Articulate the different components of a programme, the logical connections between them, and the changes that are expected to occur because of their implementation.
  • Identify the underlying theory and assumptions on which a programme is based.
  • Make implied causality explicit.
  • Draw a road map for a programme that defines its expected outcomes and identifies the inputs and activities that get it there.
  • Provide a solid foundation and rich framework to guide the implementation of a programme as well as its evaluation.

Components of a theory of change

A theory of change explains how and why a programme leads to change by showing the causal chain that leads from its inputs through to its expected outcomes. A theory of change can be as broad or as specific as needed, depending on whether it is describing a small activity, a programme, a policy, or an organisation. Common components of a theory of change include:

  • Situation – The situational context and need that sparked the creation of the programme
  • Goals –The overall aims of the programme
  • Audience – Who the programme is intended to reach and all groups who will directly benefit from the programme
  • Inputs –The resources (time, personnel, funding) invested into a programme
  • Activities – The major categories of activities run as part of a programme
  • Outputs – The tangible products that are produced as a result of key activities
  • Outcomes – The justifiable changes that are expected to result from a programme. This includes changes in behaviours, attitudes, and awareness, which should be able to be measured. Outcomes range from short to long-term.
  • Assumptions – Theories, beliefs, and contextual factors on which the programme is based
  • External factors – Factors that influence the programme that are beyond the control of its implementers

In addition to a visual model depicting these different components, an accompanying narrative can be added to a programme’s theory of change. A narrative is not necessary, but can add value by:

  • Elaborating on components of the theory of change and explaining concepts in more detail.
  • Adding background information about the programme that cannot be captured in the visual.
  • Providing further information about the theories, assumptions, research evidence, and frameworks used to inform and guide the programme.

Adapted from: HM Treasury, 2020; Mayne, J. 2017; Rogers, P. 2014 

This is an example of a theory of change GREO created for The Safer Gambling Movement, an integrated suite of safer gambling programmes implemented by Ara and Beacon Counselling Trust in Great Britain. Theories of change can be visually represented in many ways to increase understanding.

The Safer Gambling Movement theory of change

 

Safer gambling theories of change

Featured below are examples of theories of change of safer gambling initiatives from around the world. These resources can inspire and inform your safer gambling evaluation plans.

Note: This symbol (♠) indicates a theory of change for a safer gambling initiative that is especially relevant to stakeholders of the National Strategy to Reduce Gambling Harms in Great Britain.

Theories of change
  • Mapping a theory of change for the Gambling Credit Card Ban, Gambling Commission, 2020♠
  • Reducing gambling-related harms, GamCare, 2020♠
  • Local Prevention Program Evaluation 2014-2017: Report summary, Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation, 2018
  • Scotland Reducing Gambling Harm logic model – June 2020, ALLIANCE, 2020
  • Evaluation of Gamgard: A tool to identify gaming risks to vulnerable players under ‘normal’ playing conditions, Centre for Research on Educational and Community Services, University of Ottawa, 2018

 See more theories of change in GREO's Evidence Centre.

Search theories of change

 

Do you have a completed theory of change for a safer gambling initiative that could be added to this webpage? Email evaluation@greo.ca to submit your evaluation.

Receive Email Updates...
×

© 2021 Gambling Research Exchange

55 Wyndham St. N., Suite 214A
Guelph, ON, Canada, N1H 7T8
Tel: (519) 763-8049

Twitter icon

AccessibilityPrivacySitemapEvidence CentreContact UsBoard Login
Designed by eSolutions
  • About Us
    • What We Do
    • Team
    • Board of Directors
    • Join Us
  • Services
    • Applied Research
    • Knowledge Products 
    • Knowledge Management
    • Stakeholder Engagement
    • Impact Evaluation
    • Project Consulting
  • Resources
    • Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling
    • Data Repository
    • Evidence Centre
    • Gambling from a Public Health Perspective
    • Research to Inform Action Evidence Hub
    • Safer Gambling Evaluation Evidence Hub
    • Resources for Safer Gambling During COVID-19
  • Partners
    • Gambling Commission
    • Funding Opportunities
  • Contact
    • Get in Touch
    • Helplines