Close
Close
Browser Compatibility Notification
It appears you are trying to access this site using an outdated browser. As a result, parts of the site may not function properly for you. We recommend updating your browser to its most recent version at your earliest convenience.
Home
I'd Like To...
Greo Logo
Contact Us Main menu icon
  • About Us
    • What We Do
    • Team
    • Our Philosophy
    • Board of Directors
    • Join Us
    View our Evidence Centre page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Services
    • Funding Opportunities
    • Applied Research
    • Knowledge Products 
    • Knowledge Management
    • Stakeholder Engagement
    • Impact Evaluation
    • Project Consulting
    View our Evidence Centre search page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Resources
    • Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling
    • Data Repository
    • Evidence Centre
    • Gambling from a Public Health Perspective
    • Prevention and Education Review: Gambling-Related Harm
    • Research to Inform Action Evidence Hub
    • Safer Gambling Evaluation Evidence Hub
    • Resources for Safer Gambling During COVID-19
    View our Evidence Centre search page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Partners
    • National Strategy to Reduce Gambling Harms in Great Britain
    • Academic Forum for the Study of Gambling (AFSG)
    View our Evidence Centre page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Contact
    • Get in Touch
    • Helplines
    View our Evidence Centre page
    Search the Evidence Centre
  • Search
News:
Pause
  • Frameworks
    • Conceptual Framework
      • Gambling Specific Factors
      • General Factors
        • Cultural
        • Psychological
        • Social
        • Biological
          • Genetic Inheritance
          • Neurobiology
  • Best Practices
  • Comorbidities
  • Cultural Factors
  • Environment
  • Gambling and the Brain
  • Gambling Assessment
  • Gambling Related Harms
  • Game Types
  • Priority Populations

Neurobiology

Show or hide navigation More

More in this Section...

Decrease text size Default text size Increase text size
Print This Page
Share This Page
  • Open new window to share this page via Facebook Facebook
  • Open new window to share this page via LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Open new window to share this page via Twitter Twitter
  • Email This page Email
Home/.../General Factors/Biological/Neurobiology

Related Links

Contact Us

Topics

Biological Factors Banner

Studies on neurobiology have compared brain structure and functioning between people with and without gambling problems. These studies reveal changes in brain regions involved in processing reward information, controlling impulses, weighing risks, and making decisions. But the evidence is at an early stage and inconsistent findings have been reported. It is also not clear if the neurobiological changes reflect a vulnerability to harmful gambling or occur as a consequence of harmful gambling.

Behavioural tasks have been widely used to detect changes in brain functioning. Many studies have found that people with gambling problems are more likely to make impulsive choice and have impaired decision-making. For example, they prefer a smaller reward that is available immediately over a larger reward that is delayed. People with gambling problems often make impulsive choices when experiencing intense moods (e.g., sadness, frustration). This may reflect difficulties in regulating emotions, which can affect gambling behaviour. In more severe cases, there are broader deficits in executive function. Executive function refers to mental skills that enable one to plan, organize, monitor actions, and work toward one’s goals. 

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been used to examine brain activity when performing a task. In these studies, participants perform tasks related to reward and decision making while lying in a brain scanner. fMRI studies have found that people with gambling problems show changes in a network of brain regions commonly known as the brain reward system. However, mixed findings have been reported. Some studies have reported stronger activity in people with gambling problems compared to those without gambling problems, while other studies have reported weaker activity.

Activity in the brain reward system may be shaped by the structural characteristics of gambling games. Structural characteristics are specific game features. For example, a near-miss is a game feature where the outcome is very close to a win (e.g., getting two out of the three jackpot symbols). Near-misses can motivate people to gamble longer. It has been reported that near-misses trigger responses in the brain reward system, specifically the striatum and insula. These brain responses are stronger in people with gambling problems when compared to those without gambling problems.

Dopamine is a key neurotransmitter in the brain reward system. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging has been used to measure dopamine release in the brain. Some studies have found an increase in dopamine release in people with gambling problems during a gambling task or after taking an amphetamine. (Amphetamine is a stimulant drug that increases the release of dopamine, leading to pleasurable effects, and can be addictive.)

To date, the most promising drug therapy for gambling is the opioid receptor antagonist, naltrexone. Naltrexone targets dopamine pathways in the brain. Some clinical trials have supported the benefits of naltrexone in reducing gambling problems. However, the mechanism of how the drug works as a gambling treatment is still unknown.

A few studies have examined the noradrenaline system, which is a hormone system that plays a key role in arousal. People with gambling problems may have increased arousal, such as increased heart rate, due to an abnormal noradrenaline system. Increased arousal during gambling may be a sign of harmful gambling, but the evidence is mixed. Other studies have begun to look at the serotonin system, which is known to contribute to mood and anxiety disorders. The serotonin system may be very relevant as many people with gambling problems also have mood and anxiety disorders.


Download the two-page Biological Factors summary (PDF)
Also available in:  Francais   |   Spanish   |   Mandarin

Download the Biological Factors section from the Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling (PDF)

Download the complete Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling (PDF)


Search the Evidence Centre for Neurobiology



Receive Email Updates...
×
Greo promotes health and well-being by mobilizing evidence to prevent and mitigate harms related to gambling, gaming, technology use, and the use of substances.
 
© 2025 Greo Evidence Insights
Suite 195, 3-304 Stone Road West
Guelph, ON N1G 4W4
Canada

Tel: (519) 763-8049

Twitter icon 

AccessibilityPrivacySitemapEvidence CentreContact UsBoard Login
Designed by eSolutions Group
  • About Us
    • What We Do
    • Team
    • Our Philosophy
    • Board of Directors
    • Join Us
  • Services
    • Funding Opportunities
    • Applied Research
    • Knowledge Products 
    • Knowledge Management
    • Stakeholder Engagement
    • Impact Evaluation
    • Project Consulting
  • Resources
    • Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling
    • Data Repository
    • Evidence Centre
    • Gambling from a Public Health Perspective
    • Prevention and Education Review: Gambling-Related Harm
    • Research to Inform Action Evidence Hub
    • Safer Gambling Evaluation Evidence Hub
    • Resources for Safer Gambling During COVID-19
  • Partners
    • National Strategy to Reduce Gambling Harms in Great Britain
    • Academic Forum for the Study of Gambling (AFSG)
  • Contact
    • Get in Touch
    • Helplines